Biological species as natural kinds

Philosophy of Science 46 (4):613-622 (1979)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The fact that the names of biological species refer independently of identifying descriptions does not support the view of Ghiselin and Hull that species are individuals. Species may be regarded as natural kinds whose members share an essence which distinguishes them from the members of other species and accounts for the fact that they are reproductively isolated from the members of other species. Because evolutionary theory requires that species be spatiotemporally localized their names cannot occur in scientific laws. If natural kind status is denied to species on this ground, it must also be denied to most classes of concrete entities which are now accorded such status

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,296

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
21 (#762,792)

6 months
113 (#41,806)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Species.Philip Kitcher - 1984 - Philosophy of Science 51 (2):308-333.
Resurrecting biological essentialism.Michael Devitt - 2008 - Philosophy of Science 75 (3):344-382.
Categories, life, and thinking.Michael T. Ghiselin - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (2):269-283.
Species.Philip Kitcher - 1984 - Philosophy of Science 51 (2):308-333.

View all 55 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

A matter of individuality.David L. Hull - 1978 - Philosophy of Science 45 (3):335-360.

Add more references