- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Accounting for Belief Bias in a Mental Model Framework? No Problem! Reply to Garnham and Oakhill (2005)
Psychological Review 112 (2):519-520 (2005)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Accounting for Belief Bias in a Mental Model Framework: Comment on Klauer, Musch, and Naumer (2000).Alan Garnham & Jane V. Oakhill - 2005 - Psychological Review 112 (2):509-517.
Postscript: Accounting for belief bias in a mental model framework--No problem for whom?Alan Garnham & Jane V. Oakhill - 2005 - Psychological Review 112 (2):517-518.
The belief bias effect is aptly named: A reply to Klauer and Kellen (2011).Chad Dube, Caren M. Rotello & Evan Heit - 2011 - Psychological Review 118 (1):155-163.
Assessing the belief bias effect with ROCs: Reply to Dube, Rotello, and Heit (2010).Karl Christoph Klauer & David Kellen - 2011 - Psychological Review 118 (1):164-173.
Logicism, Mental Models and Everyday Reasoning: Reply to Garnham.Nick Chater & Mike Oaksford - 1993 - Mind and Language 8 (1):72-89.
A probabilistic epistemology of perceptual belief.Ralph Wedgwood - 2018 - Philosophical Issues 28 (1):1-25.
Constraints and nonconstraints in causal learning: Reply to White (2005) and to Luhmann and Ahn (2005).Patricia W. Cheng & Laura R. Novick - 2005 - Psychological Review 112 (3):694-706.
Information gain and decision-theoretic approaches to data selection: Response to Klauer (1999).Nick Chater & Mike Oaksford - 1999 - Psychological Review 106 (1):223-227.
Bias and blindsight: A reply to Michel and Lau (2021).Ian Phillips - 2021 - Psychological Review 128 (3):592-595.
Analytics
Added to PP
2016-06-30
Downloads
26 (#599,290)
6 months
5 (#837,573)
2016-06-30
Downloads
26 (#599,290)
6 months
5 (#837,573)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Logic, Probability, and Pragmatics in Syllogistic Reasoning.Michael Henry Tessler, Joshua B. Tenenbaum & Noah D. Goodman - 2022 - Topics in Cognitive Science 14 (3):574-601.
References found in this work
Believability and syllogistic reasoning.Jane Oakhill, P. N. Johnson-Laird & Alan Garnham - 1989 - Cognition 31 (2):117-140.
The source of belief bias effects in syllogistic reasoning.Stephen E. Newstead, Paul Pollard, Jonathan StB. T. Evans & Julie L. Allen - 1992 - Cognition 45 (3):257-284.
The source of belief bias effects in syllogistic reasoning.Stephen E. Newstead, Paul Pollard, Jonathan St B. T. Evans & Julie L. Allen - 1992 - Cognition 45 (3):257-284.
On belief bias in syllogistic reasoning.Karl Christoph Klauer, Jochen Musch & Birgit Naumer - 2000 - Psychological Review 107 (4):852-884.
Accounting for Belief Bias in a Mental Model Framework: Comment on Klauer, Musch, and Naumer (2000).Alan Garnham & Jane V. Oakhill - 2005 - Psychological Review 112 (2):509-517.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-xdvnm uwo