Kurepa trees and Namba forcing

Journal of Symbolic Logic 77 (4):1281-1290 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We show that strongly compact cardinals and MM are sensitive to $\lambda$-closed forcings for arbitrarily large $\lambda$. This is done by adding ‘regressive' $\lambda$-Kurepa trees in either case. We argue that the destruction of regressive Kurepa trees requires a non-standard application of MM. As a corollary, we find a consistent example of an $\omega_2$-closed poset that is not forcing equivalent to any $\omega_2$-directed-closed poset

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Can a small forcing create Kurepa trees.Renling Jin & Saharon Shelah - 1997 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 85 (1):47-68.
Essential Kurepa trees versus essential Jech–Kunen trees.Renling Jin & Saharon Shelah - 1994 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 69 (1):107-131.
Results on the Generic Kurepa Hypothesis.R. B. Jensen & K. Schlechta - 1990 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 30 (1):13-27.
The tree property at successors of singular cardinals.Menachem Magidor & Saharon Shelah - 1996 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 35 (5-6):385-404.
Laver Indestructibility and the Class of Compact Cardinals.Arthur W. Apter - 1998 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 63 (1):149-157.
Fragments of Martin's Maximum in generic extensions.Y. Yoshinobu & B. Konig - 2004 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 50 (3):297.
Club degrees of rigidity and almost Kurepa trees.Gunter Fuchs - 2013 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 52 (1-2):47-66.
Strongly unfoldable cardinals made indestructible.Thomas A. Johnstone - 2008 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 73 (4):1215-1248.
The differences between Kurepa trees and Jech-Kunen trees.Renling Jin - 1993 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 32 (5):369-379.
On the indestructibility aspects of identity crisis.Grigor Sargsyan - 2009 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 48 (6):493-513.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-11-03

Downloads
30 (#550,897)

6 months
6 (#587,658)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Indestructible Strong Unfoldability.Joel David Hamkins & Thomas A. Johnstone - 2010 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 51 (3):291-321.
Operations, climbability and the proper forcing axiom.Yasuo Yoshinobu - 2013 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 164 (7-8):749-762.
The ⁎-variation of the Banach–Mazur game and forcing axioms.Yasuo Yoshinobu - 2017 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 168 (6):1335-1359.
Preservation theorems for Namba forcing.Osvaldo Guzmán, Michael Hrušák & Jindřich Zapletal - 2021 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 172 (2):102869.

Add more citations

References found in this work

[Omnibus Review].Thomas Jech - 1992 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 57 (1):261-262.
[Omnibus Review].Akihiro Kanamori - 1981 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 46 (4):864-866.
Separating stationary reflection principles.Paul Larson - 2000 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 65 (1):247-258.

View all 9 references / Add more references