Philosophy of biology: Naturalistic or transcendental?

Acta Biotheoretica 55 (1):35-46 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The aim of this article is to clarify the meaning of a naturalistic position within philosophy of biology, against the background of an alternative view, founded on the basic insights of transcendental philosophy. It is argued that the apparently minimal and neutral constraints naturalism imposes on philosophy of science turn out to involve a quite heavily constraining metaphysics, due to the naturalism’s fundamental neglect of its own perspective. Because of its intrinsic sensitivity to perspectivity and historicity, transcendental philosophy can avoid this type of hidden metaphysics.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,098

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
63 (#263,192)

6 months
19 (#145,295)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gertrudis Van de Vijver
University of Ghent

Citations of this work

Transcendental niche construction.Werner Callebaut - 2007 - Acta Biotheoretica 55 (1):73-90.
Subjectivity and Objectivity: A Matter of Life and Death?Gertrudis Van de Vijver & Joris Van Poucke - 2008 - Cosmos and History : The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy 4 (1-2):15-28.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Empirical Stance.Bas C. Van Fraassen - 2004 - New York: Yale University Press.
The Empirical Stance.Bas C. Van Fraassen - 2002 - Yale University Press.
The Empirical Stance.Bas C. Van Fraassen - 2002 - Yale University Press.

View all 11 references / Add more references