Requirements, reasons, and Raz: Legal positivism and legal duties

Ethics 109 (2):375-407 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1086/233899

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Review of Matthew H. Kramer: Critical Legal Theory and the Challenge of Feminism: A Philosophical Reconception. [REVIEW]Robin West - 1997 - Ethics 107 (2):372-376.
Raz, Exclusionary Reasons, and Legal Positivism.Tim Dare - unknown
Matthew H. Kramer, Critical Legal Theory and the Challenge of Feminism: A Philosophical Reconception Reviewed by.Annalise Acorn - 1995 - Philosophy in Review 15 (4):259-262.
A modest proposal.J. Allan - 2003 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 23 (2):197-210.
Matthew H. Kramer, Legal Theory, Political Theory, and Deconstruction: Against Rhadamanthus Reviewed by.David Dyzenhaus - 1991 - Philosophy in Review 11 (6):401-403.
Law and Legal Obligation: A Study in the Legal Theories of H. L. A. Hart, Joseph Raz, and Ronald Dworkin.John David Eatman - 1981 - Dissertation, Tulane University
Enunciados no comprometidos y punto de vista jurídico: una perspectiva renovada.Diego Dei Vecchi - 2017 - Critica 49 (147):91-121.
The Anarchist Official: A Problem for Legal Positivism.Kenneth M. Ehrenberg - 2011 - Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 36:89-112.
Must the Law Be Capable of Possessing Authority?Dale Smith - 2012 - Legal Theory 18 (1):69-100.
In Defense of Finnis on Natural Law Legal Theory.Michael Baur - 2005 - Vera Lex 6 (1/2):35-56.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
77 (#221,071)

6 months
8 (#415,167)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Matthew Henry Kramer
Cambridge University

Citations of this work

What Does ‘Legal Obligation’ Mean?Daniel Wodak - 2018 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 99 (4):790-816.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references