A cure for worry? Kierkegaardian faith and the insecurity of human existence

Abstract
Abstract   In his discourses on ‘the lily of the field and the bird of the air,’ Kierkegaard presents faith as the best possible response to our precarious and uncertain condition, and as the ideal way to cope with the insecurities and concerns that his readers will recognize as common features of human existence. Reading these discourses together, we are introduced to the portrait of a potential believer who, like the ‘divinely appointed teachers’—the lily and the bird—succeeds in leading a life that is full of care, but free of worry. Such a portrait, we claim, echoes Kierkegaard’s portrait of the knight of faith in Fear and Trembling . In this essay we suggest that faith, as characterized in the ‘lily and bird’ discourses, is a kind of existential trust that would allow us to overcome worry, while remaining wholeheartedly engaged in the finite realm of our cares and concerns. We claim that Kierkegaard’s goal in these discourses is not to belittle our earthly cares, but to invite us to develop a modified attitude toward all that we are susceptible to worry about. Content Type Journal Article Category Article Pages 1-19 DOI 10.1007/s11153-011-9322-5 Authors Sharon Krishek, Department of Philosophy, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel Rick Anthony Furtak, Department of Philosophy, Colorado College, Colorado Springs, CO, USA Journal International Journal for Philosophy of Religion Online ISSN 1572-8684 Print ISSN 0020-7047
Keywords Faith  Kierkegaard  Love  Ethics  Existentialism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11153-011-9322-5
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
The Fragility of Goodness.Martha Nussbaum - 1988 - Journal of Philosophy 85 (7):376-383.
Concluding Unscientific Postscript.Søen Kierkegaard & Walter Lowrie - 1941 - Princeton University Press for American-Scandinavian Foundation.

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Is Goodness Without God Good Enough? A Debate on Faith, Secularism, and Ethics.Wes Morriston - 2011 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 70 (1):85-89.
Michael Ruse, Science and Spirituality: Making Room for Faith in the Age of Science. [REVIEW]Edward Schoen - 2011 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 70 (1):97-101.
God, Ignorance and Existence.Giovanni Mion - 2012 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 72 (2):85-88.
Editorial Preface Vol. 70.2.Ronald L. Hall - 2011 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 70 (2):107-108.
The Enactment of Love by Faith.Sharon Krishek - 2010 - Faith and Philosophy 27 (1):3-21.
Verbin, N., Divinely Abused: A Philosophical Perspective on Job and His Kin. [REVIEW]A. Anderson - 2011 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 70 (2):155-159.
Science and Religion Today. [REVIEW]Michael Ruse - 2011 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 70 (2):167-177.
God, Free Will, and Time: The Free Will Offense Part II. [REVIEW]J. L. Schellenberg - 2013 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 73 (3):1-10.
J. P. Moreland: The Recalcitrant Imago Dei: Human Persons and the Failure of Naturalism. [REVIEW]C. Mesle - 2011 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 70 (1):103-106.
Added to PP index
2011-10-30

Total downloads
114 ( #44,624 of 2,193,597 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
10 ( #19,145 of 2,193,597 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature