Philosophy of Science 51 (1):163-171 (1984)

Authors
Paul Horwich
New York University
Abstract
Discussion of Wittgenstein's philosophy has suffered from a scarcity of commentators who understand his work well enough to explain it in their own words. Apart from certain notable exceptions, all too many advocates and critics alike have tended merely to repeat slogans, with approval or ridicule as the case may be. The result has been an unusual degree of polarization and acrimony—some philosophers abandoning normal critical standards, falling under the spell and becoming fanatical supporters; and others taking an equally extreme opposite view, deriding the absence of analytic technique, and refusing to see anything of value in Wittgenstein's work.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 1982, 1984
DOI 10.1086/289172
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,078
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

A Guided Tour Of Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics.David Plunkett & Herman Cappelen - 2020 - In Herman Cappelen, David Plunkett & Alexis Burgess (eds.), Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 1-26.
The Rise and Fall of Experimental Philosophy.Antti Kauppinen - 2007 - Philosophical Explorations 10 (2):95 – 118.
Ontological Realism.Theodore Sider - 2009 - In David Chalmers, David Manley & Ryan Wasserman (eds.), Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology. Oxford University Press. pp. 384--423.
Know-How as Competence. A Rylean Responsibilist Account.David Lowenstein - 2017 - Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.

View all 351 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Kripke, Wittgenstein, and the Private Language Argument.Petra von Morstein - 1980 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 11 (1):61-74.
„Gramatické Pravidlo“ U Neskorého Wittgensteina.Tomáš Čana - 2006 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 13 (3):349-360.
A Defence of Wittgenstein's Private Language Argument.Kichang Nam - 1993 - Dissertation, Michigan State University

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-02-19

Total views
49 ( #229,217 of 2,498,897 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #102,106 of 2,498,897 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes