Omniscience and Eternity: A Reply to Craig

Faith and Philosophy 18 (3):369-376 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Craig claims that my treatment of temporal indexicals such as ‘now’ is inadequate, and that my theory gives no general account of tense. Craig’s argument misunderstands the theory of indexicals I give, and I show how to extend the theory to give a general account of tense.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Omniscience, Tensed Facts, and Divine Eternity.William Lane Craig - 2000 - Faith and Philosophy 17 (2):227--228.
Divine Omniscience.Jonathan L. Kvanvig - 2000 - In Adrian Hastings, Alistair Mason & Hugh Pyper (eds.), The Oxford Companion to Christian Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 498-499.
Unknowable Truths and the Doctrine of Omniscience.Jonathan L. Kvanvig - 1989 - Journal of the American Academy of Religion 57:485-507.
Rejoinder to William Lane Craig.David B. Myers - 2003 - Religious Studies 39 (4):427-430.
``Unknowable Truths and Omniscience: A Reply to Kvanvig".Charles Taliaferro - 1993 - Journal of the American Academy of Religion 61:553-566.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
10 (#1,118,334)

6 months
1 (#1,428,112)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jonathan L. Kvanvig
Washington University in St. Louis

Citations of this work

The divine attributes.Nicholas Everitt - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (1):78-90.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Omniscience, Tensed Facts, and Divine Eternity.William Lane Craig - 2000 - Faith and Philosophy 17 (2):225-241.
Omniscience, Tensed Facts, and Divine Eternity.William Lane Craig - 2000 - Faith and Philosophy 17 (2):227--228.
Omniscience and Eternity.Jonathan L. Kvanvig - 2001 - Faith and Philosophy 18 (3):369-376.

Add more references