The public good that does the public good: A new reading of mohism

Asian Philosophy 3 (2):125 – 141 (1993)

Abstract Mohism has long been misrepresented. Mo?tzu is usually called a utilitarian because he preached a universal love that must benefit. Yet Mencius, who pined the Confucian way of virtue (humaneness and righteousness) against Mo?tzu's way of benefit, basically borrowed Mo?tzu's thesis: that the root cause of chaos is this lack of love?except Mencius renamed it the desire for personal benefit. Yet Mo?tzu only championed ?benefit? to head off its opposite, ?harm?, specifically the harm done by Confucians who with good intent (love) perpetuated rites that did people more harm than good. Mo?tzu wanted his universal love to be the public good that would actually do the public good (i.e. benefit the collective). And he derived this from Confucius? teaching of ?Love (all) men? and his Golden Rule: Render not what others would not desire. No man desires harm. As a critic of Confucian rites (especially the prolonged funeral), Mo?tzu worked to replace the blind custom of rites with his rational measure of ?rightness?: what is right must do good (i.e. benefit the intended recipient). It is not true that Mohists were ?joyless? ascetics; they would gladly celebrate a good harvest with wine and folk song?not expensive court music?with the people. Since Mohist discourse is ?public? (that is, accountable), it is also only proper that what is ?right? should be outer (means?end efficacy) and not inner as Mencius would insist
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/09552369308575379
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 44,365
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Mo Tzu: Basic Writings.Burton Watson (ed.) - 1963 - Columbia University Press.
The Ethical and Political Works of Motse.Yi-Pao Mei - 1929 - Westport, Conn., Hyperion Press.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Manufacturing Mohism in the Mencius.Thomas Radice - 2011 - Asian Philosophy 21 (2):139 - 152.
On “Trust and Being True”: Toward a Genealogy of Morals.Whalen Lai - 2010 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 9 (3):257-274.
Assessment of Li 利 in the Mencius and the Mozi.Wai Wai Chiu - 2014 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 13 (2):199-214.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
44 ( #192,570 of 2,271,744 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #564,635 of 2,271,744 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature