Social Epistemology 31 (3):277-295 (2017)

Abstract
This paper takes stock of a recent but growing movement within the field of deliberative democracy, which normatively argues for the epistemic dimension of democratic authority and positively defends the truth-tracking properties of democratic procedures. Authors within that movement call themselves epistemic democrats, hence the recognition by many of an ‘epistemic turn’ in democratic theory. The paper argues that this turn is a desirable direction in which the field ought to evolve, taking it beyond the ‘fact of disagreement’ that had previously blocked the conceptual road to acknowledging more than intrinsic properties to democratic decision procedures. The paper shows how two authors in particular – Joshua Cohen and David Estlund – have successfully lifted the Rawlsian requirement of epistemic abstinence and defends epistemic democrats and the implications of the epistemic turn in democratic theory against various misconceptions.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/02691728.2017.1317868
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 60,750
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Against Democracy: New Preface.Jason Brennan - 2016 - Princeton University Press.
Democracy and Disagreement.Amy Gutmann & Dennis Thompson - 1996 - Ethics 108 (3):607-610.
The Epistemology of Democracy.Elizabeth Anderson - 2006 - Episteme 3 (1-2):8-22.

View all 29 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Against Epistocracy.Paul Gunn - 2019 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 31 (1):26-82.
Yes, We Can : Answers to Critics.Hélène Landemore - 2014 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 26 (1-2):184-237.
Tracking Justice Democratically.Andreas Follesdal - 2017 - Social Epistemology 31 (3):324-339.

View all 18 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Communicative Democracy: A Version of Deliberative Democracy.Adela Cortina - 2010 - Archiv für Rechts- Und Sozialphilosophie 96 (2):133-150.
Why Democracy Cannot Be Grounded in Epistemic Principles.Eva Erman & Niklas Möller - 2016 - Social Theory and Practice 42 (3):449-473.
Deliberative Democracy and the Politics of Reconciliation.Duncan Ivison - 2010 - In David Kahane, Melissa Williams & Daniel Weinstock (eds.), Deliberative Democracy in Practice. Vancouver: UBC Press. pp. 115-137.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-06-20

Total views
54 ( #192,144 of 2,438,728 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #136,199 of 2,438,728 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes