R-HETs and the Veil of Ignorance

American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 1 (2):52-54 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Robust human enhancement technologies (R-HETs) pose challenging sets of ethical questions to researchers and legislators alike. John Basl's provocative article (2010) starts from the familiar assum...

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,774

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Human enhancement and personal identity.Philip Brey - 2009 - In Jan-Kyrre Berg Olsen, Evan Selinger & Søren Riis (eds.), New waves in philosophy of technology. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 169--185.
Toward Regulating Human Enhancement Technologies.Ellen M. McGee - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 1 (2):49-50.
Brain functors: A mathematical model for intentional perception and action.David Ellerman - 2016 - Brain: Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience 7 (1):5-17.
Rawlsian “Neutrality” and Enhancement Technologies.Richard H. Dees - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 1 (2):54-55.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-06-22

Downloads
7 (#603,698)

6 months
1 (#1,912,481)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Neurotechnologies, the State, and the Role of Epistemic Constraints.John D. Banja - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 1 (2):1-3.

Add more citations