Contesting Hierarchical Oppositions: The Dialectics of Adorno and Lacan

In Alfred J. Drake (ed.), New Essays on the Frankfurt School of Critical Theory. Cambridge Scholars Press. pp. 168-192 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Modern capitalist societies are plagued by a series of oppositions, such as the subject/object, theory/practice, and the mind/body opposition. The problem with these oppositions is that they appear in an absolute opposition and hierarchical relation, making the negative pole (the object, practice, and the body) appear inferior to the positive pole (the subject, theory, and the mind). Furthermore, the “inferior” pole is often unconsciously linked to women, racial minorities, and working-class people, reinforcing injustices towards them. In this chapter, I read Theodor W. Adorno with Jacques Lacan to explain how these oppositions are connected and different from one another, and what we can do to challenge them, and the injustices they engender.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Marx and the gendered structure of capitalism.Claudia Leeb - 2007 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 33 (7):833-859.
Rebelling against suffering in capitalism.Claudia Leeb - 2018 - Contemporary Political Theory 17 (3):263-282.
Review. [REVIEW]Gillian Rose - 1979 - History and Theory 18:126-135.
Theodor Adorno and the century of negative identity.Eric Oberle - 2018 - Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-08-28

Downloads
3 (#1,728,901)

6 months
1 (#1,516,021)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Claudia Leeb
Washington State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references