Euthyphro and the goodness of God incarnate

Ratio 24 (2):206-221 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A familiar problem is here viewed from an unfamiliar angle. The familiar problem is the Euthyphro dilemma: if God wills something because it is good, then goodness is independent of God, so God becomes, morally speaking, de trop. On the other hand, if something is good because God wills it, then, given the absence of constraint on what God may will, moral truths are – counterintuitively – contingent. An examination of the kinds of necessity and possibility at work in this conundrum leads us to the most promising solution: there is a metaphysical connection between God and goodness. What he wills is an expression of his nature. But (and this is the unfamiliar angle), that solution now poses an acute problem for an understanding of the Incarnation. For if God is constitutive of goodness, and Christ is God incarnate, then Christ is constitutive of goodness. But Christ, as a human, is subject to external moral evaluation and obligation, which entails that he is not constitutive of goodness. This metaethical difficulty is not easily met by the usual strategies by which Christ is understood to have two natures. Reflection on our moral relations to our past selves, however, suggests a way forward

Other Versions

original Poidevin, Robin Le (2011) "Euthyphro and the Goodness of God Incarnate". Ratio 24(2):206-221

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,061

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Why Is God Good?Bruce Reichenbach - 1980 - Journal of Religion 60 (1):51-66.
Thomas Aquinas on God and Evil.Brian Davies - 2011 - Oxford University Press.
Can God’s Goodness Save the Divine Command Theory from Euthyphro?Jeremy Koons - 2012 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 4 (1):177-195.
The euthyphro dilemma.Tim Mawson - 2008 - Think 7 (20):25-33.
Goodness.Paul Helm - 1997 - In Charles Taliaferro & Philip L. Quinn (eds.), A Companion to Philosophy of Religion. Cambridge, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 263–269.
God’s moral goodness and supererogation.Elizabeth Drummond Young - 2013 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 73 (2):83-95.

Analytics

Added to PP
n/a

Downloads
90 (#202,732)

6 months
9 (#346,375)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Robin Le Poidevin
University of Leeds

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references