Critical Horizons 9 (1):42-59 (2008)

This paper explores the tension between pragmatism and utopia, especially in the concept of "realistic utopianism". It argues that historically, the pragmatic and gradualist rejection of utopia has been anti-utopian in effect, notably in the case of Popper. More recent attempts to argue in favour of "realistic utopianism" or its equivalent, by writers such as Wallerstein and Rorty are also profoundly anti-utopian, despite Rorty's commitment to "social hope". They co-opt the terminology of utopia to positions that are antagonistic to radical alterity. But this is not a necessary response to the utopia/pragmatism tension: Unger, who is explicitly opposed to utopia, in fact proffers a more sympathetic resolution based on the merits of vision, social improvization and collective learning. These may lie closer to the core of the utopian project as a vehicle for the education of desire than Unger himself recognizes.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1558/crit.v9i1.42
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,316
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Philosophy and Social Hope.Richard Rorty - 1999 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 58 (3):714-716.

View all 34 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Responsibility for Social Hope.Marcus Morgan - 2016 - Thesis Eleven 136 (1):107-123.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
130 ( #91,071 of 2,519,512 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #137,544 of 2,519,512 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes