Authors
Andrew Light
George Mason University
Abstract
J. Baird Callicott has thrown down the gauntlet once again in the monism?pluralism debate in environmental ethics. In a recent article he argues that his ?communitarianism? (combined with a limited intertheoretic pluralism) is sufficient to get the advantages of pluralism advocated by his critics, while at the same time retaining the framework of moral monism. Callicott's attempt to set the record straight on the monism?pluralism debate has once again derailed us from answering the most important question in this discussion: how do we achieve a compatibilism among ethical theories which will inform better environmental practices? But if Callicott got it wrong, then who is getting it right? Arne Naess, whose work has heretofore been excluded from the mainstream discussion of this issue, has all along understood the heart of the monism?pluralism question. This paper updates the current state of the monism?pluralism debate, provides an answer to Callicott's latest challenge, and advances the thesis that all involved in this argument would do well to take a look at what Naess has to say on this issue
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/00201749608602421
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,242
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Environmental Ethics.Andrew Brennan - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Re-Thinking Nature: Towards an Eco-Pluralism.Patrick Curry - 2003 - Environmental Values 12 (3):337 - 360.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Moral Monism in Environmental Ethics Defended.J. Baird Callicott - 1994 - Journal of Philosophical Research 19:51-60.
No Holism Without Pluralism.Gary E. Varner - 1991 - Environmental Ethics 13 (2):175-179.
The Land Ethic and Callicott's Ethical System (1980-2001): An Overview and Critique.Y. S. Lo - 2001 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 44 (3):331 – 358.
The Case Against Moral Pluralism.J. Baird Callicott - 1990 - Environmental Ethics 12 (2):99-124.
Callicott’s “Metaphysics of Morals”.Jim Cheney - 1991 - Environmental Ethics 13 (4):311-325.
Monism on the One Hand, Pluralism on the Other.Matthew H. Slater - 2005 - Philosophy of Science 72 (1):22-42.
Minimal, Moderate, and Extreme Moral Pluralism.Peter S. Wenz - 1993 - Environmental Ethics 15 (1):61-74.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-30

Total views
24 ( #437,381 of 2,419,521 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #542,629 of 2,419,521 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes