Turing cones and set theory of the reals

Archive for Mathematical Logic 40 (8):651-664 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We investigate Turing cones as sets of reals, and look at the relationship between Turing cones, measures, Baire category and special sets of reals, using these methods to show that Martin's proof of Turing Determinacy (every determined Turing closed set contains a Turing cone or is disjoint from one) does not work when you replace “determined” with “Blackwell determined”. This answers a question of Tony Martin

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Variations on determinacy and ℵω1.Ramez L. Sami - 2022 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 87 (2):721-731.
Turing independence and Baire category.Ashutosh Kumar & Saharon Shelah - forthcoming - Journal of Mathematical Logic.
Some Consequences of And.Yinhe Peng, W. U. Liuzhen & Y. U. Liang - 2023 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 88 (4):1573-1589.
Turing determinacy and the continuum hypothesis.Ramez L. Sami - 1989 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 28 (3):149-154.
Schnorr trivial reals: a construction. [REVIEW]Johanna N. Y. Franklin - 2008 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 46 (7-8):665-678.
Martin’s conjecture and strong ergodicity.Simon Thomas - 2009 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 48 (8):749-759.
Infinite time Turing machines.Joel David Hamkins & Andy Lewis - 2000 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 65 (2):567-604.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-23

Downloads
18 (#825,698)

6 months
10 (#384,490)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Benedikt Löwe
University of Amsterdam

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references