Philosophical Quarterly 19 (75):135-144 (1969)

Authors
William G. Lycan
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Abstract
This paper compares the attempts of hare, Singer and gewirth to provide the trivially true universalizability principle with normative content. The programs of hare and singer share an inability to convict the sincere fanatic ( the servant of an immoral but aesthetically compelling ideal) of moral inconsistency. Gewirth avoids the "fanatic" pitfall by adding some purely logical footwork; but his system too admits of important indeterminacies which may or may not prove fatal, E.G., The handling of morally tolerable coercion and of the occasional duty to repair damage caused by someone else
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2307/2217682
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,374
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
207 ( #45,640 of 2,420,334 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #542,912 of 2,420,334 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes