J. Jeans’ Idealism About Space And Its Influences On E.A. Milne At The Dawn Of Modern Cosmology

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 46 (2):303-315 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper deals with two important English scientists of the first half of the twentieth century: Edward Arthur Milne and James Hopwood Jeans. It examines the philosophical reasons that, in 1932, induced Milne to devote himself to the newborn modern cosmology. Among those reasons, it is argued that the most important ones were some of Jeans’ philosophical statements regarding the new relativistic view of the expanding universe. In particular, Milne reacted to some confusing idealist opinions expressed by Jeans in the London newspaper The Times, in May 1932, in a debate on the expansion of the universe. Actually, as it will be shown, Jeans received many criticisms about the philosophical reasonings present in all of his popularizing works.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,774

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Before cosmophysics: E.A. Milne on mathematics and physics.Helge Kragh & Simon Rebsdorf - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 33 (1):35-50.
Edward Arthur Milne—The relations of mathematics to science.S. Rebsdorf & H. Kragh - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 33 (1):51-64.
Before cosmophysics: E.A. Milne on mathematics and physics.Helge Kragh & Simon Rebsdorf - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 33 (1):35-50.
James Jeans and radiation theory.Rob Hudson - 1989 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 20 (1):57-76.
The Anthropic Cosmological Principle. [REVIEW]Michael Heller - 1987 - Review of Metaphysics 40 (3):564-565.
A Mistaken Attribution to Lady Mary Shepherd.Deborah Boyle - 2020 - Journal of Modern Philosophy 2 (1):5.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-16

Downloads
9 (#449,242)

6 months
2 (#1,816,284)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Add more citations