Why Gibbs Phase Averages Work—The Role of Ergodic Theory

&
Philosophy of Science 47 (3):339-349 (1980)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We propose an "explanation scheme" for why the Gibbs phase average technique in classical equilibrium statistical mechanics works. Our account emphasizes the importance of the Khinchin-Lanford dispersion theorems. We suggest that ergodicity does play a role, but not the one usually assigned to it

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1086/288941

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,296

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Malament and Zabell on Gibbs phase averaging.Stephen Leeds - 1989 - Philosophy of Science 56 (2):325-340.
Why ergodic theory does not explain the success of equilibrium statistical mechanics.John Earman & Miklós Rédei - 1996 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (1):63-78.
Epsilon-ergodicity and the success of equilibrium statistical mechanics.Peter B. M. Vranas - 1998 - Philosophy of Science 65 (4):688-708.
The foundational role of ergodic theory.Massimiliano Badino - 2005 - Foundations of Science 11 (4):323-347.
Why equilibrium statistical mechanics works: Universality and the renormalization group.Robert W. Batterman - 1998 - Philosophy of Science 65 (2):183-208.
Ergodic theory, interpretations of probability and the foundations of statistical mechanics.Janneke van Lith - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 32 (4):581--94.
Center for Philosophy of Science.John Earman & Miklos Redei - unknown
Explaining Thermodynamic-Like Behavior in Terms of Epsilon-Ergodicity.Roman Frigg & Charlotte Werndl - 2011 - Philosophy of Science 78 (4):628-652.
Thermodynamics: What One Needs to Know.Carl S. Helrich - 1999 - Zygon 34 (3):501-514.
A new approach to the approach to equilibrium.Roman Frigg & Charlotte Werndl - 2012 - In Yemima Ben-Menahem & Meir Hemmo (eds.), Probability in Physics. Springer. pp. 99-114.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
32 (#516,416)

6 months
114 (#41,169)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sandy Zabell
Northwestern University

Citations of this work

Compendium of the foundations of classical statistical physics.Jos Uffink - 2006 - In J. Butterfield & J. Earman (eds.), Handbook of the philosophy of physics. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Probabilities in Statistical Mechanics.Wayne C. Myrvold - 2016 - In Alan Hájek & Christopher Hitchcock (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Probability and Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 573-600.
What Are the New Implications of Chaos for Unpredictability?Charlotte Werndl - 2009 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (1):195-220.
In Search of the Holy Grail: How to Reduce the Second Law of Thermodynamics.Katie Robertson - 2022 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 73 (4):987-1020.

View all 40 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The Well-Posed Problem.Edwin T. Jaynes - 1973 - Foundations of Physics 3 (4):477-493.
Statistical explanation and ergodic theory.Lawrence Sklar - 1973 - Philosophy of Science 40 (2):194-212.
A partial vindication of ergodic theory.K. S. Friedman - 1976 - Philosophy of Science 43 (1):151-162.
The role of statistical mechanics in classical physics.David Lavis - 1977 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 28 (3):255-279.

View all 6 references / Add more references