One alignment mechanism or many?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):204-205 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Pickering & Garrod (P&G) suggest that communicators synchronize their processing at a number of linguistic levels. Whereas their explanation suggests that representations are being compared across individuals, there must be some representation of all conversation participants in each participant's head. At the level of the situation model, it is important to maintain separate representations for each participant. At other levels, it seems less crucial to have a separate representation for each participant. This analysis suggests that different mechanisms may synchronize representations at different linguistic levels.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Situation alignment and routinization in language acquisition.Peter F. Dominey - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):195-195.
Full alignment of some but not all representations in dialogue.Holly P. Branigan - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):191-192.
Resonance within and between linguistic beings.Stephen D. Goldinger & Tamiko Azuma - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):199-200.
Stufen des Selbstbewusstseins: Eine Analyse von Ich-Gedanken.Gottfried Vosgerau - 2009 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 78 (1):101–130.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
22 (#732,350)

6 months
6 (#588,740)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references