Utilitas 12 (2):137-154 (2000)

Authors
Lou Matz
University of the Pacific
Abstract
In ‘Utility of Religion’, Mill argues that a wholly naturalistic religion of humanity would promote individual and social welfare better than supernatural religions like Christianity; in ‘Theism’, however, Mill defends the salutary effects of hope in an afterlife. While commentators have acknowledged this discrepancy, they have not examined the utilitarian value of what Mill terms ‘illusions’. In this essay, I explain Mill's case against the utility of supernatural religious belief and then argue that Mill cannot dismiss the utility of hope in an ultimate justice since it need not pervert the intellect or morality. There are thus utilitarian grounds to support some supernatural illusions, which undermines Mill's defence of an exclusively naturalistic religion. I conclude with the suggestion that while the utility of religious belief leads Mill toward William James's view, they disagree about whether supernatural religious sentiment has any unique, intrinsic force.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0953820800002752
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,194
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Religion within the Limits of Reason alone.Immanuel Kant & Theodore M. Greene - 1936 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 43 (1):11-12.
A Common Faith. [REVIEW]R. S. - 1934 - Journal of Philosophy 31 (21):584.
Mill's Secular Religion.Leo Rauch - 1972 - Journal of Critical Analysis 3 (4):178-187.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Three Essays on Religion.Lou Matz (ed.) - 2009 - Broadview Press.
Was Mill a Liberal?Chin-Liew Ten - 2002 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 1 (3):355-370.
Mill's Harm Principle as Social Justice.Huodong Li - 2004 - Dissertation, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale
Hume and Mill on 'Utility of Religion': A Borgean Garden of Forking Paths?José L. Tasset - 2007 - Τέλος. Revista Iberoamericana de Estudios Utilitaristas 14 (2):117-129.
Mill on the Cultivation of Feeling.Alan Millar - 2010 - Philosophical Papers 39 (3):457-472.
What is Mill's Principle of Utility?D. G. Brown - 1973 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 3 (1):1-12.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-08-30

Total views
48 ( #221,995 of 2,448,328 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #450,727 of 2,448,328 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes