Abortion and the value of the future. A reply to: a defence of the potential future of value theory

Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (3):202-202 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The future like ours argument implies no limitation on abortion rights. The author of the argument concedes that on the intended interpretation, abortion is not shown to be impermissible. The alternative self-represented future interpretation also implies a prochoice view

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,745

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A future like ours revisited.M. T. Brown - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (3):192-195.
A defence of the potential future of value theory.Don Marquis - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (3):198-201.
The morality of abortion and the deprivation of futures.M. T. Brown - 2000 - Journal of Medical Ethics 26 (2):103-107.
Abortion and the Epicurean challenge.Karl Ekendahl - 2020 - Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (4):273-274.
Animalism, Abortion, and a Future Like Ours.Andrea Sauchelli - 2019 - The Journal of Ethics 23 (3):317-332.
The parenthood argument.William Simkulet - 2017 - Bioethics 32 (1):10-15.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
69 (#82,832)

6 months
6 (#1,472,471)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Abortion, embryo destruction and the future of value argument.J. Savulescu - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (3):133-135.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Why abortion is immoral.Don Marquis - 1989 - Journal of Philosophy 86 (4):183-202.
A defence of the potential future of value theory.Don Marquis - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (3):198-201.
A future like ours revisited.M. T. Brown - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (3):192-195.

Add more references