Are Newman’s “Tests” or “Notes” of Genuine Doctrinal Development Useful Today?

Newman Studies Journal 1 (2):48-61 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Theologians have long appealed to Newman’s Essay on the Development of Christian Doctrine as a source for criteria to determine the genuineness of doctrinal developments. After pointing out that Newman changed his terminology from “tests” in the original edition to “notes” in the third edition, this article examines their current criteriological usefulness both in retrospect and in prospect.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

John Henry Newman in The "Realm of Superstition".Edward Short - 2015 - Newman Studies Journal 12 (2):46-75.
John Henry Newman.William Kelly - 2012 - Newman Studies Journal 9 (1):5-17.
John Henry Newman.William Kelly - 2012 - Newman Studies Journal 9 (1):5-17.
Newman In Retrospect.Avery Cardinal Dulles - 2004 - Newman Studies Journal 1 (1):7-19.
Encountering Truth.Chau Nguyen - 2011 - Newman Studies Journal 8 (1):40-55.
Encountering Truth.Chau Nguyen - 2011 - Newman Studies Journal 8 (1):40-55.
John Henry Newman’s View of the “Darwin Theory”.Ryan Vilbig - 2011 - Newman Studies Journal 8 (2):52-61.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
9 (#1,266,389)

6 months
5 (#836,975)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?