Nygren and Oord on Love

Process Studies 49 (2):275-291 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article offers a critique of Anders Nygrens influential theory of love, which radically distinguishes among ^ros, agape, and philm. By contrast, a defense is offered of Thomas Jay Oord's view, which I label "kenotically donated love" or "full-Oorded" love. Comparisons are developed of related biological relationships like mutualism, commensalism, and parasitism.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,590

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-12-11

Downloads
16 (#227,957)

6 months
7 (#1,397,300)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Bradford McCall
Holy Apostles College and Seminary

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

For the Love of God: Agape.Colin Grant - 1996 - Journal of Religious Ethics 24 (1):3-21.
Love, Christian and Diverse: A Response to Colin Grant.Edward Collins Vacek - 1996 - Journal of Religious Ethics 24 (1):29-34.
Ethics and the New Theology.Charles Hartshorne - 1934 - International Journal of Ethics 45 (1):90-101.
Lamenting the Loss of Love: A Response to Colin Grant.Carter Heyward - 1996 - Journal of Religious Ethics 24 (1):23-28.

Add more references