Futile treatment, junior doctors and role virtues

Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (11):646-649 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Futile treatment is one ethically challenging situation commonly encountered by junior doctors. By analysing an intern's story using a role virtues framework, I propose a set of three steps for junior doctors facing this problem. I claim that junior doctors ought always to investigate the rationale underlying decisions to proceed with apparently futile treatment and discuss their concerns with their seniors, even if such discussion will be difficult. I also suggest that junior doctors facing this ethical challenge ought always to be willing to initiate and engage in ethical dialogue, and that in some situations further action (such as taking concerns outside the team or refusing to participate in treatment) may be morally appropriate

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,774

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The junior doctor as ethically unique.R. McDougall - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (4):268-270.
Junior doctors and moral exploitation.Joshua Parker - 2019 - Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (9):571-574.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-10-19

Downloads
41 (#112,661)

6 months
22 (#694,291)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Junior doctors and moral exploitation.Joshua Parker - 2019 - Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (9):571-574.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Primum non tacere: An Ethics of Speaking Up.James Dwyer - 1994 - Hastings Center Report 24 (1):13-18.

Add more references