Philosophical Issues 15 (1):386–405 (2005)
There may be circumstances in which it is morally justifiable intentionally to kill a person who is morally innocent, threatens no one, rationally wishes not to die, and does not consent to be killed. Although the killing would wrong the victim, it might be justified by the necessity of averting some disaster that would otherwise occur. In other instances of permissible killing, however, the justification appeals to more than consequences. It may appeal to the claim that the person to be killed has acted in such a way that to kill him would neither wrong him nor violate his rights, even if he has not consented to be killed or to be subjected to the risk of being killed. In these cases, I will say that the person is liable to be killed. Although I borrow the notion of liability from legal theory, and although much of what I say will be informed by the literature on liability in both tort law and criminal law, my concern in this article is with moral rather than legal liability.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Rights, Liability, and the Moral Equality of Combatants.Uwe Steinhoff - 2012 - Journal of Ethics 16 (4):339-366.
Why We Shouldn't Reject Conflicts: A Critique of Tadros.Uwe Steinhoff - 2014 - Res Publica 20 (3):315-322.
Justifying Defense Against Non-Responsible Threats and Justified Aggressors: The Liability Vs. The Rights-Infringement Account.Uwe Steinhoff - forthcoming - Philosophia:1-19.
Similar books and articles
Self-Defence and the Principle of Non-Combatant Immunity.Helen Frowe - 2011 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 8 (4):530-546.
Libertarianism, Self-Ownership and Consensual Killing.Peter Vallentyne - 2002 - Revue Philosophique De Louvain.
Two Act-Omission Paradoxes.Ingmar Persson - 2004 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 104 (2):147–162.
Equating Innocent Threats and Bystanders.Helen Frowe - 2008 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 25 (4):277-290.
Is the Risk–Liability Theory Compatible with Negligence Law?Toby Handfield & Trevor Pisciotta - 2005 - Legal Theory 11 (4):387-404.
Moral Liability to Defensive Killing and Symmetrical Self-Defense.David R. Mapel - 2010 - Journal of Political Philosophy 18 (2):198-217.
Licence to Kill? The Question of Just Vs. Unjust Combatants.Lene Bomann-Larsen - 2004 - Journal of Military Ethics 3 (2):142-160.
A Defense of St. Thomas and the Principle of Double Effect.Daniel F. Montaldi - 1986 - Journal of Religious Ethics 14 (2):296 - 332.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads96 ( #51,607 of 2,152,538 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #119,679 of 2,152,538 )
How can I increase my downloads?