Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):30-31 (1997)
AbstractGlenberg tries to explain how and why memories have semantic content. The theory succeeds in specifying the relations between two major classes of memory phenomena – explicit and implicit memory – but it may fail in its assignment of relative importance to these phenomena and in its account of meaning. The theory is syntactic and extensional, instead of semantic and intensional.
Similar books and articles
The Construction of Meaning.Walter Kintsch & Praful Mangalath - 2011 - Topics in Cognitive Science 3 (2):346-370.
Autobiographical Memory and Autonoetic Consciousness in a Case of Semantic Dementia.Pascale Piolino, Serge Belliard, Béatrice Desgranges, Mélisa Perron & Francis Eustache - 2003 - Cognitive Neuropsychology 20 (7):619-639.
Being the Agent: Memory for Action Events.Elena Daprati, Daniele Nico, Nicolas Franck & Angela Sirigu - 2003 - Consciousness and Cognition 12 (4):670-683.
Episodic Memory in Semantic Dementia: Implications for the Roles Played by the Perirhinal and Hippocampal Memory Systems in New Learning.Kim S. Graham & John R. Hodges - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):452-453.
Remembering-That: Episodic Vs. Semantic.Andrew Naylor - 2011 - Philosophical Psychology 24 (3):317 - 322.
Episodic Memory and Autonoetic Consciousness: A First-Person Approach.John M. Gardiner - 2002 - In Alan Baddeley, John Aggleton & Martin Conway (eds.), Episodic Memory: New Directions in Research. Oxford University Press. pp. 11-30.
Further Evidence in Support of a Distributed Semantic Memory System.Eleanor M. Saffran & H. Branch Coslett - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):492-493.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads