Análisis Filosófico 28 (1):77-89 (2008)
In this paper, I suggest that the notion of module explicitly defined by Peter Carruthers in The Architecture of The Mind (Carruthers 2006) is not really In use in the book. Instead, a more robust notion seems to be actually in play. The more robust notion, albeit implicitly assumed, seems to be far more useful for making claims about the modularity of mind. Otherwise, the claims would become trivial. This robust notion will be reconstructed and improved upon by putting it into a more general framework of mental architecture. I defend the view that modules are the outcome of structural rather than functional decomposition and that they should be conceived as near decomposable systems.
|Keywords||modularity Carruthers decomposition|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Cognitive Modularity, Biological Modularity and Evolvability.Claudia Lorena García - 2007 - Biological Theory: Integrating Development, Evolution and Cognition (KLI) 2 (1):62-73.
Moderately Massive Modularity.Peter Carruthers - 2003 - In Anthony O'Hear (ed.), Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement. Cambridge University Press. pp. 67-89.
Modular Architectures and Informational Encapsulation: A Dilemma.Dustin Stokes & Vincent Bergeron - 2015 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 5 (3):315-38.
Simple Heuristics Meet Massive Modularity.Peter Carruthers - 2006 - In Peter Carruthers, Stephen Laurence & Stephen P. Stich (eds.), The Innate Mind: Culture and Cognition. Oxford University Press.
The Case for Massively Modular Models of Mind.Peter Carruthers - 2006 - In Robert J. Stainton (ed.), Contemporary Debates in Cognitive Science. Blackwell.
Précis of the Architecture of the Mind: Massive Modularity and the Flexibility of Thought.Peter Carruthers - 2008 - Mind and Language 23 (3):257–262.
Us, Them and It: Modules, Genes, Environments and Evolution.Fiona Cowie - 2008 - Mind and Language 23 (3):284–292.
Structural Flaws: Massive Modularity and the Argument From Design.Armin W. Schulz - 2008 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (4):733-743.
Added to index2009-04-30
Total downloads45 ( #110,361 of 2,143,474 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #227,032 of 2,143,474 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.