Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (4):402-413 (2009)

Authors
Tony Milligan
University of Hertfordshire
Abstract
My primary concern will be to cast light upon the relation between animal guardians ('pet owners') and pets as a deep relation. I will proceed with a degree of indirectness by explaining why animal guardians can have an epistemically-privileged position when it comes to end-of-life decisions concerning pets. My contention is that they are best placed to grasp the relevant narrative considerations upon which end-of-life deliberation in marginal cases ought to depend. Such narrative-appreciation is built into the practice of treating animals as pets. By virtue of having such a narrative appreciation, animal guardians can be best placed to grasp the life-role of pain and suffering.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1468-5930.2009.00460.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,401
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Towards a Balanced Account of Expertise.Christian Quast - 2018 - Social Epistemology 32 (6):397-418.
Against Moral Intrinsicalism.Nicolas Delon - 2015 - In Elisa Aaltola & John Hadley (eds.), Animal Ethics and Philosophy: Questioning the Orthodoxy. London: Rowman and Littlefield International. pp. 31-45.
Animals as Friends.Cynthia Townley - 2010 - Between the Species 13 (10):3.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-07-28

Total views
43 ( #247,274 of 2,445,458 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #457,040 of 2,445,458 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes