Hegel Bulletin:1-19 (forthcoming)

Authors
Nicolas Garcia Mills
University of Chicago
Abstract
My aim in this paper is to show that and how animal organisms are appropriate subjects of normative evaluation, on Hegel's view. I contrast my reading with the interpretive positions of Sebastian Rand and Mark Alznauer. I disagree with Rand and agree with Alznauer that animal organisms are normatively evaluable for Hegel. I substantiate my disagreement with Rand, and supplement Alznauer's interpretation, by spelling out the role that the ‘generic process’ or ‘genus process [Gattungsprozess]’ plays within Hegel's account of animal organisms and their normative evaluability. In the course of my discussion, I highlight the main differences that Hegel purports to identify between animal and vegetable organisms and suggest that the upshot of those differences is that some but not all plants are normatively evaluable, by his lights. I also situate Hegel's discussion of the Gattungsprozess within the debate on biological functions in the philosophy of biology over the last few decades.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/hgl.2020.15
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,577
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Functional Analysis.Robert Cummins - 1975 - Journal of Philosophy 72 (November):741-64.
In Defense of Proper Functions.Ruth Garrett Millikan - 1989 - Philosophy of Science 56 (June):288-302.
An Organizational Account of Biological Functions.Matteo Mossio, Cristian Saborido & Alvaro Moreno - 2009 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (4):813-841.
The Teleological Notion of 'Function'.Karen Neander - 1991 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 69 (4):454 – 468.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Logical and Natural Life in Hegel.Anton Kabeshkin - forthcoming - European Journal of Philosophy.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Hegel's Theory of Responsibility.Mark Alznauer - 2015 - Cambridge University Press.
What's Wrong with Rex? Hegel on Animal Defect and Individuality.Sebastian Rand - 2015 - European Journal of Philosophy 23 (1):68-86.
Hegel, Norms and Ontology.Joe Saunders - 2019 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 36 (3):279-297.
Hegel’s Anti-Ontology of Nature.Sebastian Rand - 2017 - In Marjolein Oele & Gerard Kuperus (eds.), Ontologies of Nature. Springer Verlag.
Spiritual Consumption.Douglas Finn - 2015 - The Owl of Minerva 47 (1/2):109-167.
Hegel's Theory of Normativity.Mark Alznauer - 2016 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 2 (2):196-211.
Desire and Nature in Hegel’s Philosophy.Paola Giacomoni - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 16:115-124.
From Replica to Instruments: Animal Models in Biomedical Research.Pierre-Luc Germain - 2014 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 36 (1):114-128.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-07-09

Total views
10 ( #870,181 of 2,446,621 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #456,908 of 2,446,621 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes