On the distinction between creation and conservation: A partial defence of continuous creation

Religious Studies 45 (4):471-485 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The traditional view of divine conservation holds that it is simply a continuation of the initial act of creation. In this essay, I defend the continuous-creation tradition against William Lane Craig's criticism that continuous creation fundamentally misconstrues the intuitive distinction between creation and conservation. According to Craig, creation is the unique causal activity of bringing new patient entities into existence, while conservation involves acting upon already existing patient entities to cause their continued existence. I defend continuous creation by challenging Craig's intuitive distinction and by showing that the alternative account of creation and conservation he bases upon it is fraught with serious internal difficulties

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,678

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-10-25

Downloads
90 (#188,438)

6 months
11 (#349,679)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Creation and conservation.Jonathan Kvanvig - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references