Software informed consent: Docete emptorem, not caveat emptor [Book Review]

Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (3):357-362 (1998)
Abstract
Should software be sold “as is”, totally guaranteed, or something else? This paper suggests that “informed consent”, used extensively in medical ethics, is an appropriate way to envision the buyer/developer relationship when software is sold. We review why the technical difficulties preclude delivering perfect software, but allow statistical predictions about reliability. Then we borrow principles refined by medical ethics and apply them to computer professionals.
Keywords software engineering ethics  software informed consent  computer ethics
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11948-998-0028-8
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 31,317
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Critiquing a Critique.Keith Miller - 2008 - Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (2):245-249.
The Uniqueness of Software Errors and Their Impact on Global Policy.Don Gotterbarn - 1998 - Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (3):351-356.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
32 ( #180,002 of 2,223,805 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #180,515 of 2,223,805 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature