Matter, mind and models

Abstract

This chapter attempts to explain why people become confused by questions about the relation between mental and physical events. When a question leads to confused, inconsistent answers, this may be because the question is ultimately meaningless or at least unanswerable, but it may also be because an adequate answer requires a powerful analytical apparatus. It is the author's view that many important questions about the relation between mind and brain are of that second kind, and that some of the necessary technical and conceptual tools are becoming available as a result of work on the problems of making computer programs behave intelligently. We shall suggest a theory to explain why introspection does not give clear answers to these questions. Technical solutions to the questions will not be attempted, but there is probably some value in finding at least a clear explanation of why we are confused.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,990

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Morality and the Meaning of Life: Some First Thoughts.Norman Dahl - 1987 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 17 (1):1 - 22.
How Things Persist. [REVIEW]William Edgar - 2003 - Review of Metaphysics 57 (2):410-412.
How Things Persist. [REVIEW]William Edgar - 2003 - Review of Metaphysics 57 (2):410-412.
An approach to why-questions.Antti Koura - 1988 - Synthese 74 (2):191 - 206.
The Nature of Immorality.Jean Hampton - 1989 - Social Philosophy and Policy 7 (1):22.
Explanation and Scientific Realism.Philip Gasper - 1990 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 27:285-295.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
105 (#164,722)

6 months
12 (#304,934)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?