The concept of harm reconceived: A different look at wrongful life [Book Review]

Law and Philosophy 7 (1):3 - 33 (1988)
Abstract
In wrongful life litigation a congenitally impaired child brings suit against those, usually physicians, whose negligence caused him to be born into his suffering existence. A key conceptual question is whether we can predicate harm in such cases. While a few courts have permitted it, many courts deny that we can, and thus have refused these children standing to sue. In this article the author examines the wrongful life cases and literature enroute to a broader consideration of harm. This literature, and philosophical discussions of harm generally, rely on a definition which ascribes harm by comparing an individual's current condition with that in which he would otherwise have been, but for the allegedly harmful event. The author shows this definition to be conceptually and morally flawed. A superior general definition is offered which, when then applied to wrongful life cases, shows that we can easily ascribe harm in these cases and can find clear potential for tort liability.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00149707
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,233
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Directed Organ Donation: Discrimination or Autonomy?Guido Pennings - 2007 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 24 (1):41–49.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law.Joel Feinberg - 1984 - Oxford University Press.
Conception and the Concept of Harm.E. Haavi Morreim - 1983 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 8 (2):137-158.
When Is Birth Unfair to the Child?Bonnie Steinbock & Ron McClamrock - 1994 - Hastings Center Report 24 (6):15-21.
Wrongful Life, Wrongful Disability, and the Argument Against Cloning.David K. Chan - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Research 32 (Supplement):257-272.
Rethinking Procreation: Why It Matters Why We Have Children.Mianna Lotz - 2011 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 28 (2):105-121.
What is Wrong with 'Wrongful Life' Cases?Barry M. Loewer - 1985 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 10 (2):127-146.
The Ascription of Rights in Wrongful Life Suits.Nancy S. Jecker - 1987 - Law and Philosophy 6 (2):149-165.
The Moral Status of Enabling Harm.Samuel C. Rickless - 2011 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92 (1):66-86.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

39 ( #133,108 of 2,172,871 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #324,901 of 2,172,871 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums