Environmental Ethics 12 (2):185-192 (1990)
Peter Reed has defended the basis for an environmental ethic based upon feelings of awe for nature together with an existentialist absolute gulf between humans and nature. In so doing, he has claimed that there are serious difficulties with Ecosophy T and the terms, Self-realization and identification with nature. I distinguish between discussions of ultimate norms and the penultimate deep ecology platform. I also clarify and defend a technical use of identification and attempt to show that awe and identification may be compatible concepts
|Keywords||Applied Philosophy General Interest|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Deep Ecology-Ecofeminism Debate and its Parallels.Warwick Fox - 1989 - Environmental Ethics 11 (1):5-25.
A State of Mind Like Water: Ecosophy T and the Buddhist Traditions.Deane Curtin - 1996 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 39 (2):239 – 253.
Was Arne Naess Recognized as the Founder of Deep Ecology Prematurely? Semantics and Environmental Philosophy.Benjamin Howe - 2010 - Environmental Ethics 32 (4):369-383.
Anthropomorphism Without Anthropocentrism: A Wittgensteinian Ecofeminist Alternative to Deep Ecology.Wendy Lee-Lampshire - 1996 - Ethics and the Environment 1 (2):91-102.
Deep Ecology and Ecofeminism: The Self in Environmental Philosophy.Colette Sciberras - 2002 - Dissertation, Lancaster
Deep Ecology From the Perspective of Environmental Science.Frank B. Golley - 1987 - Environmental Ethics 9 (1):45-55.
Identification with Nature: What It is and Why It Matters.Christian Diehm - 2007 - Ethics and the Environment 12 (2):1-22.
On Warwick Fox's Assessment of Deep Ecology.Harold Glasser - 1997 - Environmental Ethics 19 (1):69-85.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads26 ( #198,130 of 2,177,875 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #112,944 of 2,177,875 )
How can I increase my downloads?