Man Apart and Deep Ecology: A Reply to Reed

Environmental Ethics 12 (2):185-192 (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Peter Reed has defended the basis for an environmental ethic based upon feelings of awe for nature together with an existentialist absolute gulf between humans and nature. In so doing, he has claimed that there are serious difficulties with Ecosophy T and the terms, Self-realization and identification with nature. I distinguish between discussions of ultimate norms and the penultimate deep ecology platform. I also clarify and defend a technical use of identification and attempt to show that awe and identification may be compatible concepts.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Man Apart and Deep Ecology: A Reply to Reed.Arne Naess - 1990 - Environmental Ethics 12 (2):185-192.
Deep Ecology and the Irrelevance of Morality.Mathew Humphrey - 1999 - Environmental Ethics 21 (1):75-79.
Deep Ecology and the Irrelevance of Morality.Mathew Humphrey - 1999 - Environmental Ethics 21 (1):75-79.
Man Apart.Peter Reed - 1989 - Environmental Ethics 11 (1):53-69.
A state of mind like water: Ecosophy T and the buddhist traditions.Deane Curtin - 1996 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 39 (2):239 – 253.
On Warwick Fox’s Assessment of Deep Ecology.Harold Glasser - 1997 - Environmental Ethics 19 (1):69-85.
On Warwick Fox’s Assessment of Deep Ecology.Harold Glasser - 1997 - Environmental Ethics 19 (1):69-85.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
11 (#351,772)

6 months
57 (#272,530)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references