A modal interpretation of the logic of interrogation

Journal of Logic, Language and Information 15 (3):251-271 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX


We propose a novel interpretation of natural-language questions using a modal predicate logic of knowledge. Our approach brings standard model-theoretic and proof-theoretic techniques from modal logic to bear on questions. Using the former, we show that our interpretation preserves Groenendijk and Stokhof's answerhood relation, yet allows an extensional interpretation. Using the latter, we get a sound and complete proof procedure for the logic for free. Our approach is more expressive; for example, it easily treats complex questions with operators that scope over questions. We suggest a semantic criterion that restricts what natural-language questions can express. We integrate and generalize much previous work on the semantics of questions, including Beck and Sharvit's families of subquestions, non-exhaustive questions, and multi-party conversations.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,480

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

An Incomplete Relevant Modal Logic.Lou Goble - 2000 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 29 (1):103-119.
Which Modal Logic Is the Right One?John P. Burgess - 1999 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 40 (1):81-93.
Modal Logic and Model Theory.Giangiacomo Gerla & Virginia Vaccaro - 1984 - Studia Logica 43 (3):203 - 216.
Interpretations of Intuitionist Logic in Non-Normal Modal Logics.Colin Oakes - 1999 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 28 (1):47-60.
Bilattices and the Semantics of Natural Language Questions.R. Nelken & N. Francez - 2002 - Linguistics and Philosophy 25 (1):37-64.


Added to PP

112 (#109,631)

6 months
1 (#417,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?