362 found
Order:
  1. Jaakko Hintikka (1962). Knowledge and Belief. Ithaca, N.Y.,Cornell University Press.
  2.  91
    Jaakko Hintikka (2007). Socratic Epistemology: Explorations of Knowledge-Seeking by Questioning. Cambridge University Press.
    Most current work in epistemology deals with the evaluation and justification of information already acquired. In this book, Jaakko Hintikka instead discusses the more important problem of how knowledge is acquired in the first place. His model of information-seeking is the old Socratic method of questioning, which has been generalized and brought up-to-date through the logical theory of questions and answers that he has developed.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   18 citations  
  3.  26
    Jaakko Hintikka (1996). The Principles of Mathematics Revisited. Cambridge University Press.
    This book, written by one of philosophy's pre-eminent logicians, argues that many of the basic assumptions common to logic, philosophy of mathematics and metaphysics are in need of change. It is therefore a book of critical importance to logical theory. Jaakko Hintikka proposes a new basic first-order logic and uses it to explore the foundations of mathematics. This new logic enables logicians to express on the first-order level such concepts as equicardinality, infinity, and truth in the same language. The famous (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   31 citations  
  4.  31
    Jaakko Hintikka (1975). The Intensions of Intentionality and Other New Models for Modalities. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   60 citations  
  5. Jaakko Hintikka (1973). Logic, Language-Games and Information: Kantian Themes in the Philosophy of Logic. Oxford,Clarendon Press.
    I LOGIC IN PHILOSOPHY— PHILOSOPHY OF LOGIC i. On the relation of logic to philosophy I n this book, the consequences of certain logical insights for ...
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   58 citations  
  6. Jaakko Hintikka (1969). Models for Modalities. Dordrecht, D. Reidel.
  7. Jaakko Hintikka (1998). Inquiry as Inquiry a Logic of Scientific Discovery.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   18 citations  
  8.  81
    Jaakko Hintikka (1998). What Is Abduction? The Fundamental Problem of Contemporary Epistemology. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 34 (3):503 -.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   25 citations  
  9. Jaakko Hintikka (1962). Cogito, Ergo Sum: Inference or Performance? Philosophical Review 71 (1):3-32.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   22 citations  
  10.  81
    Ilpo Halonen & Jaakko Hintikka (2005). Toward a Theory of the Process of Explanation. Synthese 143 (1-2):5 - 61.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   12 citations  
  11.  16
    Jaakko Hintikka (1967). Aspects of Inductive Logic. Amsterdam, North Holland Pub. Co..
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   35 citations  
  12. Jaakko Hintikka (1999). The Emperor's New Intuitions. Journal of Philosophy 96 (3):127 - 147.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   13 citations  
  13.  79
    Jaakko Hintikka (1988). On the Development of the Model-Theoretic Viewpoint in Logical Theory. Synthese 77 (1):1 - 36.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   22 citations  
  14.  20
    Jaakko Hintikka (1970). Information and Inference. D. Reidel.
  15. Jaakko Hintikka (1975). Impossible Possible Worlds Vindicated. Journal of Philosophical Logic 4 (4):475 - 484.
  16.  69
    Jaakko Hintikka (2004). A Fallacious Fallacy? Synthese 140 (1-2):25 - 35.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  17.  38
    Jaakko Hintikka (forthcoming). Philosophical Research: Problems and Prospects. Diogenes:0392192116640720.
    The world of philosophy can perhaps be seen as a microcosm of the world at large. In the course of the last few decades, the world has seen the collapse of the communist system of Russia, a major crisis of the free market economy in the USA, Europe and Japan, and massive economic changes in China. One perspective on contemporary philosophical research is reached by asking what crises the major philosophical traditions, if not literally “systems”, are likewise undergoing and what (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  52
    Jaakko Hintikka (1988). What is the Logic of Experimental Inquiry? Synthese 74 (2):173-90.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   15 citations  
  19. Jaakko Hintikka, Ilkka Niiniluoto & Esa Saarinen (1982). Essays on Mathematical and Philosophical Logic. Studia Logica 41 (4):432-433.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   18 citations  
  20.  12
    Jaakko Hintikka (1987). The Fallacy of Fallacies. Argumentation 1 (3):211-238.
    Several of the so-called “fallacies” in Aristotle are not in fact mistaken inference-types, but mistakes or breaches of rules in the questioning games which were practiced in the Academy and in the Lyceum. Hence the entire Aristotelian theory of “fallacies” ought to be studied by reference to the author's interrogative model of inquiry, based on his theory of questions and answers, rather than as a part of the theory of inference. Most of the “fallacies” mentioned by Aristotle can in fact (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   16 citations  
  21. Jaakko Hintikka & Ilpo Halonen (1995). Semantics and Pragmatics for Why-Questions. Journal of Philosophy 92 (12):636-657.
  22. Jaakko Hintikka (1999). The Emperor's New Intutions. Journal of Philosophy 96 (3):127-147.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  23.  45
    Jaakko Hintikka (2005). Omitting Data—Ethical or Strategic Problem? Synthese 145 (2):169-176.
    Omitting experimental data is often considered a violation of scientific integrity. If we consider experimental inquiry as a questioning process, omitting data is seen to be merely an example of tentatively rejecting (‘bracketing’) some of nature’s answers. Such bracketing is not only occasionally permissible; sometimes it is mandated by optimal interrogative strategies. When to omit data is therefore a strategic rather than ethical question. These points are illustrated by reference to Millikan’s oil drop experiment.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. Jaakko Hintikka & Gabriel Sandu (1995). The Fallacies of the New Theory of Reference. Synthese 104 (2):245 - 283.
    The so-called New Theory of Reference (Marcus, Kripke etc.) is inspired by the insight that in modal and intensional contexts quantifiers presuppose nondescriptive unanalyzable identity criteria which do not reduce to any descriptive conditions. From this valid insight the New Theorists fallaciously move to the idea that free singular terms can exhibit a built-in direct reference and that there is even a special class of singular terms (proper names) necessarily exhibiting direct reference. This fallacious move has been encouraged by a (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  25.  15
    Alan R. White & Jaakko Hintikka (1965). Knowledge and Belief: An Introduction to the Logic of the Two Notions. Philosophical Quarterly 15 (60):268.
  26. Jaakko Hintikka (2011). What is the Axiomatic Method? Synthese 183 (1):69-85.
    The modern notion of the axiomatic method developed as a part of the conceptualization of mathematics starting in the nineteenth century. The basic idea of the method is the capture of a class of structures as the models of an axiomatic system. The mathematical study of such classes of structures is not exhausted by the derivation of theorems from the axioms but includes normally the metatheory of the axiom system. This conception of axiomatization satisfies the crucial requirement that the derivation (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  27.  62
    Gabriel Sandu & Jaakko Hintikka (2001). Aspects of Compositionality. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 10 (1):49-61.
    We introduce several senses of the principle ofcompositionality. We illustrate the difference between them with thehelp of some recent results obtained by Cameron and Hodges oncompositional semantics for languages of imperfect information.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  28.  60
    Jaakko Hintikka (1981). On the Logic of an Interrogative Model of Scientific Inquiry. Synthese 47 (1):69 - 83.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   13 citations  
  29.  53
    Jaakko Hintikka (1989). The Role of Logic in Argumentation. The Monist 72 (1):3-24.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  30.  9
    Jaakko Hintikka (2004). Independence-Friendly Logic and Axiomatic Set Theory. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 126 (1-3):313-333.
    In order to be able to express all possible patterns of dependence and independence between variables, we have to replace the traditional first-order logic by independence-friendly (IF) logic. Our natural concept of truth for a quantificational sentence S says that all the Skolem functions for S exist. This conception of truth for a sufficiently rich IF first-order language can be expressed in the same language. In a first-order axiomatic set theory, one can apparently express this same concept in set-theoretical terms, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  31.  81
    Jaakko Hintikka (1961). Modality and Quantification. Theoria 27 (3):119-128.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   17 citations  
  32. Jaakko Hintikka (1998). Truth Definitions, Skolem Functions and Axiomatic Set Theory. Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 4 (3):303-337.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  33.  9
    Jaakko Hintikka (1973). Quantifiers Vs. Quantification Theory. Dialectica 27 (3‐4):329-358.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   17 citations  
  34. Carl G. Hempel, Jaakko Hintikka, Gerald Holton, Peter Galison, Antonia Soulez & Nancy Cartwright (1993). Scientific Philosophy: Origins and Developments. Springer Netherlands.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  35.  3
    Donald Davidson & Jaakko Hintikka (1975). Words and Objections Essays on the Work of W.V. Quine. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  36.  73
    Jaakko Hintikka (1992). Carnap's Work in the Foundations of Logic and Mathematics in a Historical Perspective. Synthese 93 (1-2):167 - 189.
    Carnap's philosophy is examined from new viewpoints, including three important distinctions: (i) language as calculus vs language as universal medium; (ii) different senses of completeness: (iii) standard vs nonstandard interpretations of (higher-order) logic. (i) Carnap favored in 1930-34 the "formal mode of speech," a corollary to the universality assumption. He later gave it up partially but retained some of its ingredients, e.g., the one-domain assumption. (ii) Carnap's project of creating a universal self-referential language is encouraged by (ii) and by the (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  37. Noretta Koertge, Janet A. Kourany, Ronald N. Giere, Peter Gildenhuys, Thomas A. C. Reydon, Stéphanie Ruphy, Samir Okasha, Jaakko Hintikka & John Symons (2003). 10. Simulated Experiments: Methodology for a Virtual World Simulated Experiments: Methodology for a Virtual World (Pp. 105-125). [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 70 (1).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  38.  57
    Ilpo Halonen & Jaakko Hintikka (1999). Unification – It's Magnificent but is It Explanation? Synthese 120 (1):27-47.
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  39. Jaakko Hintikka (1974). Quantifiers Vs. Quantificational Theory. Linguistic Inquiry 5:153--77.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   13 citations  
  40.  39
    Jaakko Hintikka (1997). No Scope for Scope? Linguistics and Philosophy 20 (5):515-544.
    The notion of scope as it relates to a model of logical form is discussed. The inability of the accepted definition of scope to account for the contrast between priority scope - the logical priority of different quantifiers & other logical notions via rule ordering - & binding scope - the identification of the connection between variables of quantification & a particular quantifier - is demonstrated. The semantic ambiguity of this dichotomy of scope is explored via examination of donkey sentences. (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  41.  42
    Jaakko Hintikka (2012). Which Mathematical Logic is the Logic of Mathematics? Logica Universalis 6 (3-4):459-475.
    The main tool of the arithmetization and logization of analysis in the history of nineteenth century mathematics was an informal logic of quantifiers in the guise of the “epsilon–delta” technique. Mathematicians slowly worked out the problems encountered in using it, but logicians from Frege on did not understand it let alone formalize it, and instead used an unnecessarily poor logic of quantifiers, viz. the traditional, first-order logic. This logic does not e.g. allow the definition and study of mathematicians’ uniformity concepts (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  42.  33
    Jaakko Hintikka (1997). What Was Aristotle Doing in His Early Logic, Anyway? A Reply to Woods and Hansen. Synthese 113 (2):241-249.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  43. Jaakko Hintikka (1972). Transcendental Arguments: Genuine and Spurious. Noûs 6 (3):274-281.
  44.  65
    Jaakko Hintikka (2001). Post-Tarskian Truth. Synthese 126 (1-2):17 - 36.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  45. Jaakko Hintikka (1997). Lingua Universalis Vs. Calculus Ratiocinator an Ultimate Presupposition of Twentieth-Century Philosophy.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  46. Risto Vilkko & Jaakko Hintikka (2006). Existence and Predication From Aristotle to Frege. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73 (2):359–377.
    One of the characteristic features of contemporary logic is that it incorporates the Frege-Russell thesis according to which verbs for being are multiply ambiguous. This thesis was not accepted before the nineteenth century. In Aristotle existence could not serve alone as a predicate term. However, it could be a part of the force of the predicate term, depending on the context. For Kant existence could not even be a part of the force of the predicate term. Hence, after Kant, existence (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  47. Jaakko Hintikka (1970). On Attributions of Self-Knowledge. Journal of Philosophy 67 (February):73-87.
  48.  71
    Jaakko Hintikka (1998). Perspectival Identification, Demonstratives and “Small Worlds”. Synthese 114 (2):203-232.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  49.  59
    Jaakko Hintikka (1967). Kant on the Mathematical Method. The Monist 51 (3):352-375.
  50. Jaakko Hintikka (1992). The Interrogative Model of Inquiry as a General Theory of Argumentation. Communication and Cognition: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly Journal 25 (2-3):221-242.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
1 — 50 / 362