A Conflict Between Representation and Neutrality

Philosophical Papers 39 (1):69-96 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The nub of the following argument is that there is a conflict between the idea of (liberal) neutrality on the one hand, and an intuitively plausible idea of political representation on the other. The conflict arises when neutrality is seen as a condition for political legitimacy: neutralist political representation is only legitimate insofar as the representative does not advance political ideas based on conceptions of the good that are not endorsed by the whole of the (reasonable) polity. However, we often encounter examples of political representation that do not live up to this demand but nevertheless seem legitimate. Hence, neutralists should explain either why this counterintuitive notion of representation does not follow from neutrality or explain what representatives are meant and allowed to do in such a political arrangement. A plausible neutralist rejoinder to this is to say that legitimacy is not dependent on neutrality for all political decisions. Neutrality is important (only or predominantly) regarding a certain body of political decisions, viz., using the Rawlsian idiom, 'constitutional essentials and matters of basic justice.' However, such a two-levelled approach is not without its problems. I argue that a skein of theoretical and practical challenges to the two-levelled approach undermines, or at least weakens, this attempt to solve the problem about representation and neutrality, and that the two-levelled approach is unclear in certain key aspects. The aim of the article is, however, quite modest. It is not to challenge neutrality per se ; rather, it is a call for further clarification of the issues pertaining to the relationship between neutrality and representation

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,678

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Impossibility of Political Neutrality.Noriaki Iwasa - 2010 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 10 (2):147-155.
Why Liberal Neutralists Should Accept Educational Neutrality.Matt Sensat Waldren - 2013 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (1):71-83.
The Moral Foundations of Liberal Neutrality.Gerald Gaus - 2009 - In Thomas Christiano & John Philip Christman (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Political Philosophy. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 79–98.
Neutral Political Concern.Joseph Raz - 1986 - In The Morality of Freedom. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Political liberalism and the metaphysics of languages.Renan Silva - forthcoming - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy.
Neutrality without pluralism.Faviola Rivera-Castro - 2018 - European Journal of Political Theory 20 (2).
Nonconsequential Conception of Neutrality.Wojciech Ciszewski - 2018 - In Verena Klappstein & Maciej Dybowski (eds.), Ratio Legis: Philosophical and Theoretical Perspectives. Cham: Springer Verlag. pp. 119-136.
Neutralność państwa.Żaneta Oczkowska - 2020 - Civitas. Studia Z Filozofii Polityki 10:171-190.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-07-27

Downloads
28 (#570,287)

6 months
6 (#738,372)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Morten Nielsen
University of Copenhagen

Citations of this work

Human Dignity as High Moral Status.Manuel Toscano - 2011 - Les ateliers de l'éthique/The Ethics Forum 6 (2):4-25.
Multicultural Multilegalism – Definition and Challenges.Morten Ebbe Juul Nielsen - 2011 - Les ateliers de l'éthique/The Ethics Forum 6 (2):126-154.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Morality of Freedom.Joseph Raz - 1986 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Perfectionism.Thomas Hurka - 1993 - New York, US: Oxford University Press. Edited by Thomas L. Carson & Paul K. Moser.
Patterns of Moral Complexity.Charles E. Larmore - 1987 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
The Concept of Representation.Hanna Fenichel Pitkin (ed.) - 1967 - University of California Press.

View all 16 references / Add more references