Abortion and Compelled Physician Speech

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 43 (1):9-21 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Informed consent mandates for abortion providers may infringe the First Amendment's freedom of speech. On the other hand, they may reinforce the physician's duty to obtain informed consent. Courts can promote both doctrines by ensuring that compelled physician speech pertains to medical facts about abortion rather than abortion ideology and that compelled speech is truthful and not misleading

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,891

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The First Amendment and Physician Speech in Reproductive Decision Making.Sonia M. Suter - 2015 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 43 (1):22-34.
Anti-Abortion Exceptionalism after Dobbs.Elizabeth Sepper - 2023 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 51 (3):612-617.
The Authentic Meaning of Free Speech.Michael Arthur Vacca - 2020 - Ethics and Medics 45 (3):3-4.
Distinctions in Disclosure: Mandated Informed Consent in Abortion and ART.Judith Daar - 2015 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 43 (2):255-258.
Forced sonogram and compelled speech abortion regulations: A constitutional analysis.Vicki Toscano - 2015 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 8 (1):168-181.
Reproductive Technologies and Free Speech.Sonia M. Suter - 2021 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 49 (4):514-530.
A linguistic model of informed consent.Jan Marta - 1996 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 21 (1):41-60.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-07

Downloads
5 (#1,560,632)

6 months
3 (#1,207,367)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?