Privacy Expectations at Work—What is Reasonable and Why?

Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12 (2):201-215 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Throughout the longstanding debate on privacy, the concept has been framed in various ways. Most often it has been discussed as an area within which individuals rightfully may expect to be left alone and in terms of certain data that they should be entitled to control. The sphere in which individuals should be granted freedom from intrusion has typically been equated with the indisputably private domestic sphere. Privacy claims in the semi-public area of work have not been sufficiently investigated. In this article, the case is made that employees have reasonable expectations on privacy at work. Firstly, in a descriptive analysis, employees’ need for workspace privacy is spelt out. Secondly, a normative analysis explicates the reasons why privacy should be protected. The main thrust is to provide a more inclusive privacy concept and hence, a more adequate basis for privacy protection legislation and codes in the area of work. Contrary to prevailing workplace privacy protection, employees’ need for local privacy should be accommodated as well as informational privacy.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,098

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Ethics of Workspace Surveillance.Elin Palm - 2008 - Dissertation, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm
Securing privacy at work: The importance of contextualized consent. [REVIEW]Elin Palm - 2009 - Ethics and Information Technology 11 (4):233-241.
19 Privacy and/in the Public Sphere.Beate Roessler - 2016 - Yearbook for Eastern and Western Philosophy 2016 (1):243-256.
Privacy Rights and Public Information.Benedict Rumbold & James Wilson - 2018 - Journal of Political Philosophy 27 (1):3-25.
Law and the Philosophy of Privacy.Janice Richardson - 2015 - New York, NY: Routledge.
Feminism, democracy and the right to privacy.Annabelle Lever - 2005 - Minerva - An Internet Journal of Philosophy 9 (1).

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
194 (#106,380)

6 months
14 (#200,872)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Elin Palm
Linkoping University

Citations of this work

Privacy and social interaction.Beate Roessler & Dorota Mokrosinska - 2013 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 39 (8):771-791.
Codes of ethics in the light of fairness and harm.Dan Munter - 2013 - Business Ethics: A European Review 22 (2):174-188.
An interactive ethical assessment of surveillance‐capable software within the home‐help service sector.Elin Palm - 2013 - Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 11 (1):43-68.
Securing privacy at work: The importance of contextualized consent. [REVIEW]Elin Palm - 2009 - Ethics and Information Technology 11 (4):233-241.

Add more citations

References found in this work

What we owe to each other.Thomas Scanlon - 1998 - Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Shame and Necessity.Bernard Arthur Owen Williams - 1992 - University of California Press.
Why privacy is important.James Rachels - 1975 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 4 (4):323-333.
Shame and Necessity.Bernard Williams - 1993 - Philosophy 69 (270):507-509.

View all 27 references / Add more references