Improving Fairness in Coverage Decisions: Insights from the Harvard Community Health Plan's LORAN Commission Report

American Journal of Bioethics 4 (3):103-104 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

As the only nation in the western world without a national health insurance program, the United States faces ongoing issues of access and fairness in health care coverage. The Clinton administration tried and failed to address the problem of universal coverage. Since then we have focused on the narrower, but nonetheless real, issues of fairness and equity in the benefits package provided in insurance plans. The LORAN Commission spent two years trying to devise agreed-upon principles to govern such issues. The lesson learned was the same as that of the Ethics Force study: there was no possibility of getting agreement, let alone consensus, among the participants on how to decide what should be a covered benefit. There were, however, two generally agreed upon principles that emerged regarding health care: “Every individual should be treated alike,” and “When it comes to health, cost cannot be a consideration.” That formula translated into providing everyone with everything. The only certain outcome from such a policy would be fiscal insolvency and ultimately bankruptcy.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,612

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Justice and Fairness: A Critical Element in U.S. Health System Reform.Paul T. Menzel - 2012 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 40 (3):582-597.
The Administrator's Perspective.Addis Tamire Woldemariam - 2016 - Health Econonics, Policy and Law 11:79-83.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-14

Downloads
19 (#794,916)

6 months
7 (#594,125)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?