- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Why We Should Reject S
In Reasons and Persons. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press (1984)
Abstract
An argument against the bias towards the near; how a defence of temporal neutrality is not a defence of S; an appeal to inconsistency; why we should reject S and accept CP.Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
The Appeal to Full Relativity.Derek Parfit - 1984 - In Reasons and Persons. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
The Best Objection to the Self‐Interest Theory.Derek Parfit - 1984 - In Reasons and Persons. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Five Mistakes in Moral Mathematics.Derek Parfit - 1984 - In Reasons and Persons. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
A Reply to S Siddharth’s ‘Against Phenomenal Bonding’.Gregory Miller - 2022 - European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 18 (1):(D1)5-18.
Why Liberal Neutralists Should Accept Educational Neutrality.Matt Sensat Waldren - 2013 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (1):71-83.
Theories That Are Directly Self‐Defeating.Derek Parfit - 1984 - In Reasons and Persons. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
The paradox of group beneficence.Michael Otsuka - 1991 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 20 (2):132-149.
Analytics
Added to PP
2016-10-25
Downloads
36 (#735,536)
6 months
12 (#359,866)
2016-10-25
Downloads
36 (#735,536)
6 months
12 (#359,866)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
The Rationality of Emotional Change: Toward a Process View.Oded Na’Aman - 2021 - Noûs 55 (2):245-269.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6dc498764b-82g67 uwo