The greatest good for the most fit? John Stuart mill, Thomas Henry Huxley, and social darwinism

Journal of Social Philosophy 36 (1):72–84 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
46 (#336,028)

6 months
2 (#1,445,278)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

La neutralité axiologique, une exigence épistémologique ou éthique?Marc-Kevin Daoust - 2013 - In Éliot Litalien, Cléa Bénoliel, Simon-Pierre Cherie-Cossette, Emmanuelle Gauthier-Lamer, Thiago Hunter, Thomas Mekhaël & Louis Sagnières (eds.), Peut-on tirer une éthique de l'observation de la nature ? Les Cahiers d'Ithaque. pp. 07-23.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Mill's utilitarianism.Wendy Donner - 1998 - In John Skorupski (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Mill. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 255--292.
Introduction: the fortunes of liberal naturalism.John Skorupski - 1998 - In The Cambridge Companion to Mill. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 1--34.
T. H. Huxley's Treatment of 'Nature'.Oma Stanley - 1957 - Journal of the History of Ideas 18 (1/4):120.

View all 7 references / Add more references