The association between corporate social-responsibility and financial performance: The paradox of social cost [Book Review]

Journal of Business Ethics 15 (3):321 - 357 (1996)
Abstract
It is generally assumed that common stock investors are exclusively interested in earning the highest level of future cash-flow for a given amount of risk. This view suggests that investors select a well-diversified portfolio of securities to achieve this goal. Accordingly, it is often assumed that investors are unwilling to pay a premium for corporate behavior which can be described as socially-responsible.Recently, this view has been under increasing attack. According to the Social Investment Forum, at least 538 institutional investors now allocate funds using social screens or criteria. In addition, Alice Tepper Marlin, president of the New York-based Council on Economic Priorities has recently estimated that about $600 billion of invested funds are socially-screened (1992).
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00382958
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,300
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Philosophical Explanations.Robert Nozick - 1981 - Harvard University Press.
Corporate Social Responsibility and the Marketplace.Melville T. Cottrill - 1990 - Journal of Business Ethics 9 (9):723 - 729.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 51 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
114 ( #44,624 of 2,193,260 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #59,905 of 2,193,260 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature