The association between corporate social-responsibility and financial performance: The paradox of social cost [Book Review]

Journal of Business Ethics 15 (3):321 - 357 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is generally assumed that common stock investors are exclusively interested in earning the highest level of future cash-flow for a given amount of risk. This view suggests that investors select a well-diversified portfolio of securities to achieve this goal. Accordingly, it is often assumed that investors are unwilling to pay a premium for corporate behavior which can be described as socially-responsible.Recently, this view has been under increasing attack. According to the Social Investment Forum, at least 538 institutional investors now allocate funds using social screens or criteria. In addition, Alice Tepper Marlin, president of the New York-based Council on Economic Priorities has recently estimated that about $600 billion of invested funds are socially-screened (1992).

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 89,654

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
183 (#96,929)

6 months
3 (#433,312)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

Philosophical explanations.Robert Nozick - 1981 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Philosophical Explanations. [REVIEW]Robert Nozick - 1981 - Philosophy 58 (223):118-121.
Corporate social responsibility and the marketplace.Melville T. Cottrill - 1990 - Journal of Business Ethics 9 (9):723 - 729.

View all 9 references / Add more references