Semiotica 2017 (214):277-305 (2017)

Jamin Pelkey
Ryerson University
According to Greimas, the semiotic square is far more than a heuristic for semantic and literary analysis. It represents the generative “deep structure” of human culture and cognition which “define the fundamental mode of existence of an individual or of a society, and subsequently the conditions of existence of semiotic objects” (Greimas & Rastier 1968: 48). The potential truth of this hypothesis, much less the conditions and implications of taking it seriously (as a truth claim), have received little attention in the literature. In response, this paper traces the history and development of the logical square of opposition from Aristotle to Greimas and beyond, to propose that the relations modelled in these diagrams are embodied relations rooted in gestalt memories of kinesthesia and proprioception from which we derive basic structural awareness of opposition and contrast such as verticality, bilaterality, transversality, markedness and analogy. To make this argument, the paper draws on findings in the phenomenology of movement (Sheets-Johnstone 2011a, 2011b, 2012, Pelkey 2014), recent developments in the analysis of logical opposition (Beziau & Payette 2008), recent scholarship in (post)Greimasian semiotics (Corso 2014, Broden 2000) and prescient insights from Greimas himself (esp. 1968, 1984). The argument of the paper is further supported through a visual and textual content analysis of a popular music video, both to highlight relationships between the semiotic square and mundane cultural ideologies and to show how these relationships might be traced to the marked symmetries of bodily movement. In addition to illustrating the enduring relevance of Greimasean thought, the paper further illustrates the neglected relevance that embodied chiasmus holds for developments in anthropology, linguistics and the other cognitive sciences.
Keywords Semiotic Square  Logic  Double Binds  Algirdas Julien Greimas  Existential Graphs  Phenomenology of Movement  Asymmetry  Lateralization  Transversality  Charles S. Peirce
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1515/sem-2016-0188
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Greimas Centennial in Review.Frank Nuessel - 2018 - American Journal of Semiotics 34 (3):431-451.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Square of Opposition — a New Approach.H. Greniewski - 1953 - Studia Logica 1 (1):297-301.
The Traditional Square of Opposition.Terence Parsons - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Educational Semiotics, Greimas, and Theory of Action.Eetu Pikkarainen - 2015 - Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory.
The Vatican Square.Jean-Yves Beziau & Raffaela Giovagnoli - 2016 - Logica Universalis 10 (2-3):135-141.


Added to PP index

Total views
179 ( #61,237 of 2,462,264 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
27 ( #30,880 of 2,462,264 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes