Semiotica 2017 (214):277-305 (2017)
AbstractAccording to Greimas, the semiotic square is far more than a heuristic for semantic and literary analysis. It represents the generative “deep structure” of human culture and cognition which “define the fundamental mode of existence of an individual or of a society, and subsequently the conditions of existence of semiotic objects” (Greimas & Rastier 1968: 48). The potential truth of this hypothesis, much less the conditions and implications of taking it seriously (as a truth claim), have received little attention in the literature. In response, this paper traces the history and development of the logical square of opposition from Aristotle to Greimas and beyond, to propose that the relations modelled in these diagrams are embodied relations rooted in gestalt memories of kinesthesia and proprioception from which we derive basic structural awareness of opposition and contrast such as verticality, bilaterality, transversality, markedness and analogy. To make this argument, the paper draws on findings in the phenomenology of movement (Sheets-Johnstone 2011a, 2011b, 2012, Pelkey 2014), recent developments in the analysis of logical opposition (Beziau & Payette 2008), recent scholarship in (post)Greimasian semiotics (Corso 2014, Broden 2000) and prescient insights from Greimas himself (esp. 1968, 1984). The argument of the paper is further supported through a visual and textual content analysis of a popular music video, both to highlight relationships between the semiotic square and mundane cultural ideologies and to show how these relationships might be traced to the marked symmetries of bodily movement. In addition to illustrating the enduring relevance of Greimasean thought, the paper further illustrates the neglected relevance that embodied chiasmus holds for developments in anthropology, linguistics and the other cognitive sciences.
Similar books and articles
Aristotle’s Non-Logical Works and the Square of Oppositions in Semiotics.Stefania Bonfiglioli - 2008 - Logica Universalis 2 (1):107-126.
Greimas’s semiotic square and Greek and Roman astrology.Graham Douglas - 1997 - Semiotica 114 (1-2):1-20.
Carré sémiotique et interprétation des récits mythiques.Richard Pottier - 2006 - Sign Systems Studies 34 (2):403-414.
The square of opposition and the four fundamental choices.Antonino Drago - 2008 - Logica Universalis 2 (1):127-141.
Edusemiotics of meaningful learning experience: Revisiting Kant’s pedagogical paradox and Greimas’ semiotic square.Jani Kukkola & Eetu Pikkarainen - 2016 - Semiotica 2016 (212):199-217.
Cubes and Hypercubes of Opposition, with Ethical Ruminations on Inviolability.Frode Bjørdal - 2016 - Logica Universalis 10 (2-3):373-376.
The principle of the topological localization of symbols and the meaning of the ultimate-meaning-a contribution from the human behavioral and social-sciences.Paul F. Dhooghe & Guido Peeters - 1992 - Ultimate Reality and Meaning 15 (4):296-305.
Educational Semiotics, Greimas, and Theory of Action.Eetu Pikkarainen - 2015 - Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory.
Things that are right with the traditional square of opposition.Terence Parsons - 2008 - Logica Universalis 2 (1):3-11.
The Vatican Square.Jean-Yves Beziau & Raffaela Giovagnoli - 2016 - Logica Universalis 10 (2-3):135-141.
Person and non-person as basic concepts underlying alternative discourses about reality-an analysis based on the social-psychological relation-pattern model and greimas semiotic square.Guido Peeters - 1989 - Ultimate Reality and Meaning 12 (2):113-132.
Subalternation and existence presuppositions in an unconventionally formalized canonical square of opposition.Dale Jacquette - 2016 - Logica Universalis 10 (2-3):191-213.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Sémiotique 2021 : l’année en revue.Ott Puumeister & Frank Nuessel - 2022 - Semiotica 2022 (249):293-315.
Intercultural parallax: Comparative modeling, ethnic taxonomy, and the dynamic object.Jamin Pelkey - 2020 - Semiotica 2020 (232):147-185.
Extending the embodied semiotic square: A cultural-semantic analysis of “Follow your Arrow”.Daniel Candel - 2020 - Semiotica 2020 (236-237):275-295.
References found in this work
No references found.