Some comments on Allan Bell’s proposed turn to hermeneutics

Discourse Studies 13 (5):583-587 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I offer some comments from the perspective of someone familiar with the work of Paul Ricoeur on Allan Bell’s proposal that discourse studies take a hermeneutic turn drawing on Ricoeur’s idea of an arc of interpretation. I suggest that such a hermeneutic turn would need to be more radical than Bell proposes in that he limits it largely to questions of method, without really addressing how it might affect our understanding of either the object of discourse studies or the goal of such studies. This does raise the question, however, whether discourse studies should be considered a subdiscipline of hermeneutical philosophy.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,990

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-26

Downloads
7 (#1,407,052)

6 months
6 (#700,872)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Memory, History, Forgetting.Kathleen Blamey & David Pellauer (eds.) - 2006 - University of Chicago Press.
Memory, History, Forgetting.Kathleen Blamey & David Pellauer (eds.) - 2004 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Add more references