The Leibniz Review 9:43-63 (1999)

Authors
Franklin Perkins
University of Hawaii
Abstract
The term “idea” in the seventeenth century is notoriously difficult. Not only does each major thinker have their own understanding of “idea”—many of those thinkers themselves move ambiguously between different meanings. This confusion is generally attributed to Descartes. While ideas had only existed in the mind of God, Descartes consciously made new use of the term by applying it to things in human minds. At the same time, Descartes left many questions about what an idea is. Given Descartes’ own ambiguity, the various doctrines of ideas developed by Arnauld, Malebranche, Locke, Spinoza and Leibniz, all have some legitimate claim as interpretations of Descartes.
Keywords History of Philosophy  Major Philosophers
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 1524-1556
DOI leibniz199993
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 55,873
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

"Idea" as a Philosophical Term in the Seventeenth Century.Robert McRae - 1965 - Journal of the History of Ideas 26 (2):175.
Logik Und Semiotik in der Philosophie von Leibniz.Hans Burkhardt - 1980 - Studia Leibnitiana 13 (1):154-157.
The Philosophy of Leibniz: Metaphysics and Language.Benson Mates - 1986 - Studia Leibnitiana 19 (2):216-218.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Ideas and Self-Reflection in Leibniz.Franklin Perkins - 1999 - The Leibniz Review 9:43-63.
Ideas and Self-Reflection in Leibniz.Franklin Perkins - 1999 - The Leibniz Review 9:43-63.
Locke's Theory of Reflection.Kevin Scharp - 2008 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (1):25 – 63.
Leibniz: Logic.Wolfgang Lenzen - 2014 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Was Leibniz Confused About Confusion?Stephen M. Puryear - 2005 - The Leibniz Review 15:95-124.
Leibniz and Malebranche on Innate Ideas.Nicholas Jolley - 1988 - Philosophical Review 97 (1):71-91.
Leibniz and China: A Commerce of Light (Review).Andrew Youpa - 2006 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (1):125-126.
Leibniz on Hobbes’s Materialism.Stewart Duncan - 2010 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41 (1):11-18.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-02-15

Total views
5 ( #1,129,867 of 2,401,796 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #551,897 of 2,401,796 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes