Are we closer to free market eugenics? The crispr controversy

Zygon 54 (1):7-13 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Might the 2018 birth of two designer babies in China write the opening paragraph for the next chapter in the history of eugenics? The worldwide scientific community has tacitly put a moratorium on human clinical application of CRISPR gene editing, waiting until unknown risks can become known. But this ethical agreement has been breached, and calls are now being heard for more rigorous regulations. Perhaps religious and spiritual leaders can join the bioethical chant: the yellow light of caution is flashing.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Nurturing or Purifying the Human Genome: Promises and Pitfalls of CRISPR Germline Editing.Evelyne Shuster - 2015 - Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine 6 (3-4):299-304.
Altered Inheritance: Crispr and the Ethics of Human Genome Editing.Françoise Baylis - 2019 - Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Cutting Eugenics Out of CRISPR-Cas9.Carolyn Brokowski, Marya Pollack & Robert Pollack - 2015 - Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine 6 (3-4):263-279.
“Editing”: A Productive Metaphor for Regulating CRISPR.Ben Merriman - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (12):62-64.
Children of Capital: Eugenics in the World of Private Biotechnology.Nicholas G. Evans & Jonathan D. Moreno - 2015 - Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine 6 (3-4):285-297.
CRISPR Cautions: Biosecurity Implications of Gene Editing.Rachel M. West & Gigi Kwik Gronvall - 2020 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 63 (1):73-92.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-01-18

Downloads
60 (#275,302)

6 months
6 (#587,658)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?