Are meanings in the head? – Hillary Putnam’s "Twin Earth" thought experiment revisited

Diametros:151-159 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this article, Putnam’s “Twin Earth” thought experiment is considered from the point of view of methodology. An analysis of the experiment reveals assumptions that are essential for Putman, but are not explicitly expressed by him, and which require justification. This ultimately weakens the force of the whole argument.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,891

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ein Argument für den Externalismus.Simon Dierig - 2022 - Philosophisches Jahrbuch 129 (1):27-39.
Twin Earth.Antti Kauppinen - 2021 - In Helen De Cruz (ed.), Philosophy Illustrated. New York: Oxford University Press.
Moral Realism and Twin Earth.Stephen Laurence, Eric Margolis & Angus Dawson - 1999 - Facta Philosophica 1 (1):135-165.
Ethical Naturalism and Moral Twin Earth.Andrea Viggiano - 2008 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 11 (2):213-224.
Moral Twin Earth, Intuitions, and Kind Terms.Heimir Geirsson - 2014 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 14 (1):91-110.
In Defense of the Twin Earth–The Star Wars Continue.Miščević Nenad - 2016 - European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 12 (2).
XVI*—Twin Earth Revisited.Robert Stalnaker - 1993 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 93:297-312.
Sound intuitions on Moral Twin Earth.Michael Rubin - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 139 (3):307-327.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-11

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references