Interdisciplinarity and Peirce's classification of the sciences: A centennial reassessment

Perspectives on Science 14 (2):127-152 (2006)
Authors
Abstract
: This paper discusses the American scientist and philosopher Charles S. Peirce's (1839–1914) classification of the sciences from the contemporary perspective of interdisciplinary studies. Three theses are defended: (1) Studies on interdisciplinarity pertain to the intermediate class of Peirce's classification of all science, the sciences of review (retrospective science), ranking below the sciences of discovery (heuretic sciences) and above practical science (the arts). (2) Scientific research methods adopted by interdisciplinary inquiries are cross-categorial. Making them converge to an increasing extent with the sciences of discovery, especially the methodeutic of normative logic, is one of the future challenges for studies on interdisciplinarity. (3) The overall structure of Peirce's classification, were it to be applied in today's situation, would not, in any major respect, be radically different from what it was designed to reflect a hundred years ago, in spite of the virtually exponential creation and production of new domains and the massive increase in investment in research and scientific publication. Accordingly, charges that the sciences of discovery are becoming ever more fragmented are not new.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1162/posc.2006.14.2.127
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 34,938
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Emergence of Scientific Specialities: Six Models.Illka Niiniluoto - 1995 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 44:211-223.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Whewell on the Classification of the Sciences.Raphaël Sandoz - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 60:48-54.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Ibn Bajja and the Classification of the Sciences in Al-Andalus.Miquel Forcada - 2006 - Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 16 (2):287-307.
What is the Thematic Structure of Science?Ladislav Tondl - 1998 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 29 (2):245-264.
Final Causality in Peirce's Semiotics and His Classification of the Sciences.Helmut Pape - 1993 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 29 (4):581 - 607.
Multidisciplinarity, Interdisciplinarity, Transdisciplinarity, and the Sciences.David Alvargonzález - 2011 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 25 (4):387-403.
The Classification of the Sciences and Cross-Disciplinarity.Jaime Nubiola - 2005 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 41 (2):271-282.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
40 ( #155,388 of 2,273,082 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #376,894 of 2,273,082 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature